SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(MP) 13

SHIV DAYAL, K.K.DUBE, J.P.BAJPAI
SANTSINGH – Appellant
Versus
MADANDAS PANIKA – Respondent


SHIV DAYAL, C. J.

( 1 ) THE two questions raised for our determination are :-

(1) What is the distinction between a 'bond' and a 'promissory note'; and (2) Whether for tihe purposes of the Stamp Act, in the definition of promissory note, the explanation to Section 13 of the Negotiable instruments Act can be engrafted in Section 4 of that Act ?

( 2 ) AS regards the second question, certain observations were made by a division Bench of this Court in Kodorilal v. Sukhlal, AIR 1968 Madh Pra 4 although Shri Pandey contended that those observations are obiter, the question being of frequent occurrence, it has been referred to this Bench.

( 3 ) SECTION 2 (5) of the Stamp Act defines a bond thus :-

' 'bond' includes- (a) any instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another, on condition that the obligation shall be void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be; (b) any instrument attested by a witness and not payable to order or bearer, whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another and (c) any instrument so attested, where-by a person obliges himself to deliver grain or other agricultural produce to another. " and Section 2 (22) of




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top