SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(MP) 133

J.P.BAJPAI, SHIV DAYAL, K.K.DUBE
MANOHARLAL AWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.V.TAMSKAR, R.P.SINHA, V.S.DABIR, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

SHIV DAYAL, C. J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the orders of assessment, the orders of the Central and the State Governments holding that the petitioner is liable to pay royalty on limestone according to use the notices of demand for recovery of additional royalty and the recovery proceedings pending before the Tahsildar, maihar. He further seeks a writ of mandamus or prohibition to restrain the respondents from recovering the amounts of additional royalty in accordance with the impugned assessment and the notices of demand by coercive process, and further to direct respondents 1 and 2 to assess the petitioner properly,

( 2 ) THE respondents, while resisting the petition, raised a preliminary objection at the hearing before the Division Bench. The preliminary objection is based on section 150 of the M. P. Land Revenue Code. It was urged that an alternative remedy by way of a suit being available under that section, this petition abated by force of Section 58 (2) of the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976. The Division Bench has referred this preliminary question for decision by a lar
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top