SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(MP) 10

C.M.LODHA
BHAGWANTRAO DEORAO PATIL – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMAD KHAN ASGAR KHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Naokar, R.D.Jain

C. M. LODHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's revision against the judgment and decree dated 23rd september, 1971 by the Second Additional District Judge, Gwalior exercising the powers of Small Cause Court.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 700 principal and Rs. 300 interest, total Rs. 1,000 on the basis of the suit document dated 18-9-1966 Ex. P-1. It is not in dispute before me that the document in question was executed by the defendants for consideration. The only question canvassed before me is whether the suit for the whole of the principal amount is within limitation because the lower court has decreed the suit for Rs. 70 only in respect of what has been described by it as the last instalment

( 3 ) IN order to appreciate the point of limitation argued before me it would be proper to narrate the conditions regarding repayment contained in the bond Ex. P-1:- (1) that the amount shall be paid within ten months, (2) the monthly interest on the amount will be Rs. 11 and this amount of interest will be payable till the whole amount is paid up and (3) the amount will be paid by monthly instalments of Rs. 70 each.

( 4 ) THE lower court has held that the suit document








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top