SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(MP) 185

B.C.VARMA, C.P.SEN
ASSOCIATED COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.ISSRANI, R.C.AGRAWAL

C. P. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has preferred this appeal under Section 39 (1) of the Arbitration act, 1940, against the dismissal of its application under Section 20 of the Act.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-firm is a registered Engineering Contractor at Tawa in Hoshangabad district. It submitted tender on 4-11-70 for Group VI-B of Tawa project at Tawa. The tender was accepted by the State Government on 22-1270 to the extent of the works amounting to Rs. 40 lacs. The acceptance of tender was communicated to the plaintiff on 29-12-70 by the Chief Engineer. The contract was signed on behalf of Governor of the State of M. P. by the Chief engineer at Tawa on that date. The work was commenced by the plaintiff in january 1971 and continued up to February 1972. Under Clause 3-3-29 of the contract, the Superintending Engineer, Tawa, was the person in charge of the project and his decision was final on all questions. However, if the contractor was dissatisfied with his order, he could give a notice in writing to the superintending Engineer for referring the dispute to Arbitration. The government was the competent authority to appoint an arbitrator. On 16-101971 the Executive Engineer asked the pla











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top