C.P.SEN, M.L.MALIK, K.K.DUBE, SHIV DAYAL, J.P.BAJPAI
MANKUNWAR BAI – Appellant
Versus
SUNDERLAL JAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) ONE of us (Bajpai, J.) had referred the following question for being decided by a larger Bench:-" whether in compliance with the requirement of Sub-section (1) of section 13, is it necessary for the defendant-tenant to pay to the landlord or deposit in Court the amount of arrears of rent, the recovery of which has become barred by limitation and which the landlord-plaintiff on his part cannot recover by process in the Court? " a bench of three Judges heard the reference and by unanimous opinion dated nov. 19, 1977 (reported in AIR 1978 Madh Pra 54 (FB)) answered the question in the negative. It was held:--
"the tenant is not obliged to deposit time-barred rent under the first part of Section 13 (1) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961. " thereafter, when this Second Appeal was placed before the Single Bench, the learned counsel for the appellants relied on a decision of the Supreme Court in khadi Gram Udyog Trust v. Shri Ram Chandraji Virajman Mandir, Civil Appeal no. 1313 of 1977, D/- 28-11-1977 : (reported in AIR 1978 SC 287 ). It was urged for the appellants that the Supreme Court decision runs counter to the opinion of the Full Bench of this Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.