SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(MP) 97

J.S.VERMA, M.L.MALIK
RADHESHYAM AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KANTI RAO, N.S.KALE, R.K.Nema, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

J. S. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's suit has been decreed to the extent of Rupees 33,955. 50 Paise, with interest, only against the defendants nos. 3 to 6 and it has been dismissed in its entirety against defendants 1, 2, 7 and 8. The plaintiff in this appeal prays for passing the decree against defendants 1 and 2 (respondents 1 and 2) also but no such prayer has been made against defendants 7 and 8 who have not even been impleaded as parties. Thus the only question in this appeal is whether the suit can be decreed also against defendants Nos. 1 and 2.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff Radheshyam Agarwal is a businessman carrying on business in oil and other commodities at Jabalpur, Defendants 1 and 2 are the Central railway and Southern Railway administrations. The defendant No. 3 is a partnership firm carrying on business in coconut oil at Alwaye in the State of kerala, Defendants 4 to 6 are the partners of this firm and they are brothers. Defendants 7 and 8 are two banks.

( 3 ) IN March 1963, the plaintiff placed an order with the defendant No. 3 Firm for supply of 650 tins of coconut oil at the rate of Rs. 47 per tin, each tin containing 17 Kgs. of oil.






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top