SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 259

G.L.OZA
DHARTI PAKAD, MADANLAL AGRAWAL, GWALIOR – Appellant
Versus
JINENDRA KUMAR JAIN – Respondent


G. L. OZA, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner has challenged the election to the Rajya Sabha held on 27-6-1980.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, he wanted to contest the election for the Rajya sabha and for that purpose had filed the nomination paper. He filed his nomination paper on 23-6-1980 after depositing the security amount as required. According to him, on 25-6-1980 when the nomination papers were scrutinized the Returning Officer rejected the nomination paper of the petitioner on the ground that it was not properly filled in as it did not bear the signature of the proposer. Order not filed with the petition.

( 3 ) THE only ground urged in this petition by the petitioner is that Section 33 (1)of the Representation of the People Act which requires the nomination paper to be signed by one proposer who is an elector of the Constituency is unconstitutional as under Article 84 of the Constitution a citizen of India who holds the necessary qualifications prescribed in this article is entitled to contest the election to either House of Parliament. According to the petitioner, what right has been given under Article 84 has been taken away by Section 33 (1) of the Representa
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top