SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 56

G.L.OZA, P.D.MULYE
BHERULAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMAUTAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.S.Vaidya, Nawab Bahadur

OZA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition was heard by a learned Single Judge of this Court and after hearing the case the learned Judge felt that the question referred to us needs the decision of a larger Bench. Consequently the matter has been placed before us.

( 2 ) THE question referred is: -" whether on the facts and in the circumstances of this case the judgment-debtor can resist the execution of the decree without any application being made by him under Order. 21 Rule 2 CPC and the adjustment and/or satisfaction of the decree being recorded by the court, which passed the decree?"

( 3 ) THE facts necessary to dispose of this matter are that the petitioner obtained a decree for ejectment against the non-applicant in Civil Suit No. 7/66-A. This decree was passed on 6-5-1986. The decree was for ejectment and arrears of rent. On 7th July, 1976, this decree was put into execution with prayer for eviction of the non-applicant. The non-applicant raised certain objections to the execution by saying that the decree-holder had obtained possession of the decretal premises and after having obtained possession thereof the decree-holder entered into a fresh agreement with the non-applicant and l




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top