G.L.OZA, P.D.MULYE
BHERULAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMAUTAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition was heard by a learned Single Judge of this Court and after hearing the case the learned Judge felt that the question referred to us needs the decision of a larger Bench. Consequently the matter has been placed before us.
( 2 ) THE question referred is: -" whether on the facts and in the circumstances of this case the judgment-debtor can resist the execution of the decree without any application being made by him under Order. 21 Rule 2 CPC and the adjustment and/or satisfaction of the decree being recorded by the court, which passed the decree?"
( 3 ) THE facts necessary to dispose of this matter are that the petitioner obtained a decree for ejectment against the non-applicant in Civil Suit No. 7/66-A. This decree was passed on 6-5-1986. The decree was for ejectment and arrears of rent. On 7th July, 1976, this decree was put into execution with prayer for eviction of the non-applicant. The non-applicant raised certain objections to the execution by saying that the decree-holder had obtained possession of the decretal premises and after having obtained possession thereof the decree-holder entered into a fresh agreement with the non-applicant and l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.