SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(MP) 52

H.G.MISHRA
BHANWARLAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
BHERULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S.Garg

H. G. MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision by the defendant against the order dt. 4-9-1979, whereby the learned trial Judge has rejected his application for dismissing the suit brought by the non-applicant No. 1, Bherulal, under Order 21, Rule 63, C. P. C.

( 2 ) FACTS material for decision of this revision are as under: Plaintiff-nonapplicant No. 1 is owner of the suit house, which was attached on 10-8-1971, in execution of a decree obtained by the defendants against one Hari Durga; the number of the execution proceeding being 255/70-71. The plaintiff submitted objection under Order 21, Rule 58. CPC, which was dismissed on 23-11-1977. Thereafter the plaintiff brought the suit giving rise to this revision under Order 21, Rule 63, CPC on 23-11-1978, for declaration to the effect that since the house in question belongs to the plaintiff, it is neither attachable nor saleable in execution of the aforesaid decree.

( 3 ) IN answer to the suit the defendant-applicant inter alia raised a contention to the effect that in view of the provisions of Order 21, Rule 58 (4), as amended by the CPC Amendment Act No. 104 of 1976, the suit is not maintainable. The defendant-applicant submitted an appl












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top