SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(MP) 556

M.D.BHATT
KU. LACHHMANI – Appellant
Versus
RAMU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PATHAK, UMESH TRIVEDI

M. D. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) - This is the minor daughters revision against the lower revisional Courts order granted her maintenance amount against her father under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code from the date of the order i. e. from 9-12-81 and not from the date of her petition as bad been initially allowed by the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE minor daughter bad filed the application against her father viz, the present non-applicant, for grant of monthly maintenance amount. The father had denied the paternity of the child; and as such, her right to claim any maintenance amount. The trial Court found that the child was a legitimate one; and as such, the trial Court allowed her monthly maintenance amount of Rs. 50/- payable by the present applicants father, from the date of her application i. e. from 8-7-75. The father being aggrieved, preferred the revision in the lower revisional Court. The lower revisional Court maintained the trial Courts order in so far as the childs right for maintenance against the father was concerned. Finding regarding the paternity of the child was upheld by the lower revisional Court. Monthly maintenance too was found to be appropriate. However, since, the trial







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top