M.D.BHATT
KU. LACHHMANI – Appellant
Versus
RAMU – Respondent
( 1 ) - This is the minor daughters revision against the lower revisional Courts order granted her maintenance amount against her father under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code from the date of the order i. e. from 9-12-81 and not from the date of her petition as bad been initially allowed by the trial Court.
( 2 ) THE minor daughter bad filed the application against her father viz, the present non-applicant, for grant of monthly maintenance amount. The father had denied the paternity of the child; and as such, her right to claim any maintenance amount. The trial Court found that the child was a legitimate one; and as such, the trial Court allowed her monthly maintenance amount of Rs. 50/- payable by the present applicants father, from the date of her application i. e. from 8-7-75. The father being aggrieved, preferred the revision in the lower revisional Court. The lower revisional Court maintained the trial Courts order in so far as the childs right for maintenance against the father was concerned. Finding regarding the paternity of the child was upheld by the lower revisional Court. Monthly maintenance too was found to be appropriate. However, since, the trial
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.