SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(MP) 254

G.L.OZA, S.S.SHARMA
MOOLCHAND AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
MST. KHUSHED BI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.AGRAWAL, R.D.HUNDIKER

OZA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition was heard by Hon'ble single Judge who by his order dated 23-12-82 felt that there is a conflict of views in two single Bench judgments of this Court with regard to valuation of claim in a suit for declaration for purposes of jurisdiction where the declaration is sought in respect of title of the land which is agricultural land separately assessed to land revenue and the learned Judge, therefore, framed two questions for answer ,and Hon'ble the Chief Justice has constituted this Bench for answering the two questions. The questions are :-- "1. What shall be the proper valuation for the purposes of jurisdiction in a suit for a declaration of title to the , land separately assessed to land revenue?

( 2 ) WHAT shall be the amount of court-fee payable on such a relief?"

( 3 ) THE non-applicants plaintiffs claim-ed a declaration of title to the suit lands and also sought a relief of perpetual injunction. The suit lands are agricultural holdings assessed to land revenue. The market value of the lands is shown to be Rs. 13,500/- and the plaintiffs have valued the suit claim in these terms :--

"the suit is valued for the relief of injunction, both for the pu
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top