SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(MP) 409

P.D.MULYE, V.D.GYANI
SUNDERBAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chhazed, G.S.SOLANKI

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners praying for quashing of the order dated 25-9-1982 (Annexure VII) passed by respondent No. 4.

( 2 ) THE undisputed facts of this case are that the petitioners are the legal heirs of the deceased Gokulchand Gupta who died on 12-5-1981 during the pendency of the appeal before respondent No. 4 the appellate authority and were brought on record as such.

( 3 ) SHRI I. S. Rathore, Deputy Collector was appointed as competent authority for Rajgarh Biora and Khilchipur Tahsils by the Collector, Rajgarh under Section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Lok Parisar (Bedakhali) Adhiniyam 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam) vide Notification dated 21-2-1975. Proceedings before Shri Rathore commenced on 28-3-1975. It is also not in dispute that by the subsequent Notification dated 17-7-1975 the Collector, Rajgarh appointed Shri S. P. Sonkia, Deputy Collector as the competent authority under the Adhiniyam for Narsinghgarh and Sarangpur Tahsils. However, Shri I. S. Rathore continued to be the competent authority for Rajgaarh and Khilchipur Tahsils vide Annexure II. Thereafter Shri L. C. Malviya, Depu













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top