( 1 ) THE applicants, aggrieved by the order of First Additional Judge to District Judge, Vidisha, dt. 20-11-1981, have preferred this revision petition under S. 115 of the C. P. C.

( 2 ) NON-APPLICANT No. 1, Gorelal, filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the applicants in respect of agricultural lands Nos. 112, 105, 115 and 124, situate in village Margavali in district Vidisha. Non-applicant No. 1 along with the suit, filed an application under O. 39 Rr. 1 and 2 of the C. P. C. , praying for issuance of temporary injunction against the defendant-applicants, for restraining them from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE trial Court on 15-4-1981 passed the following order : thus according to the plaintiff the trial Court rejected the prayer of the plaintiff, to grant an ex parte temporary injunction.

( 4 ) AGGRIEVED by this order of the trial Court, the plaintiff preferred an appeal in the Court of District Judge, who in spite of the objection on the maintainability of appeal by the applicants, granted temporary injunction to the plaintiff Applicants thus challenge the impugned order on the ground that the District Judge