SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 145

B.C.VARMA, P.C.PATHAK
RAM SAHODAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DILIP NAYAK, L.S.BAGHEL

B. C. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THE following question has been referred to us for decision. "whether while dismissing a bail application an order can be made to the effect that applicant cannot be released on bail on any term whatsoever till the disposal of the case against him?" ( 2 ) THE question has arisen in the following circumstances. Applicant Ram Sahodar and Diganlal are being prosecuted for an alleged offence under S. 376, read with S. 34, Indian Penal Code. They applied for their release on bail before the Court of Session. Their application was rejected. They then came to this Court. By order, dt. 13-10-1984, passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 2403 of 1984, Hon. Bhatt, J. rejected that application. However, while rejecting that application, the learned Judge observed :"there is no justification for grant of bail to the applicants-accused on any terms, whatsoever, till the disposal of the case against them, since there is already more than sufficient incriminating evidence, for their inculpation, in the investigation done so far. "thereafter, the applicant again moved the Court of Session for his release on bail as till then the challan was filed in the Court. The application was a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top