SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 91

RAM PAL SINGH
SHAJUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.Kaushik, R.C.Lahoti

RAM PAL SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff-applicants, aggrieved by the orders passed by the Additional District 'judge, Sheopurkalan in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 54 of 1983, have invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THIS revision was taken up on 13-1-1984 and the notices were ordered to be issued to the defendant-respondents on the point of admission. Today, Shri R. C. Lahoti appears for the respondents.

( 3 ) BOTH the parties are heard.

( 4 ) SHORT facts, giving rise to this revision, are that the applicants filed Civil Suit No. 134-A of 1983 in the Court of Additional Civil Judge Class I, Sheopurkalan. Their case was that they were sitting as hawkers on the pavement and had constructed wooden temporary structures. Nagar Palik Parishad of Sheopur-Kalan wanted to construct pucca shops, 53 in number, investing about five lacs of rupees. At that time, Nagar Palika Parishad gave them oral assurance that after construction of the shops, the applicants shall be allotted some of the shops. On this oral assurance, they were sitting on the pavements for selling their wares. They further averred in the plaint that after constr















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top