RAM PAL SINGH
RAGHUNATH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KISHANLAL – Respondent
( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the judgment and decree passed by the Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Vidisha, in Civil Appeal No. 141-A of 1971 dated 6th March 1972, the appellant-defendants vhave preferred this appeal
( 2 ) THE respondent-plaintiff filed a suit in-the Court of Additional Civil Judge Class II, Basoda, for possession and mesne profits, against the appellant-defendants with the averment that he was the Bhumiswami of survey Nos. 7 and 59 measuring 8 bighas and 2 biswas of village Banwa, which he mortgaged with the defendants for Rs. 600/- only for a period of five years. After the stipulated period of five years, the plaintiff wanted to redeem the mortgage to which the defendants refused.
( 3 ) THE appellants/defendants repelled the case of the plaintiff, contested the suit and pleaded that in Samvat 2020, the plaintiff executed a 'patta' (Ext D-1) for a period of five years. The defendants further pleaded that they have acquired the rights of Bhumiswami by operation of law and cannot be ejected from their lawful possession.
( 4 ) THE trial Court after framing the issues and recording the evidence of the parties, dismissed the suit of the plaintif
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.