SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 504

RAM PAL SINGH
RAGHUNATH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KISHANLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN MISHRA, K.N.Gupta

RAM PAL SINGH, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the judgment and decree passed by the Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Vidisha, in Civil Appeal No. 141-A of 1971 dated 6th March 1972, the appellant-defendants vhave preferred this appeal

( 2 ) THE respondent-plaintiff filed a suit in-the Court of Additional Civil Judge Class II, Basoda, for possession and mesne profits, against the appellant-defendants with the averment that he was the Bhumiswami of survey Nos. 7 and 59 measuring 8 bighas and 2 biswas of village Banwa, which he mortgaged with the defendants for Rs. 600/- only for a period of five years. After the stipulated period of five years, the plaintiff wanted to redeem the mortgage to which the defendants refused.

( 3 ) THE appellants/defendants repelled the case of the plaintiff, contested the suit and pleaded that in Samvat 2020, the plaintiff executed a 'patta' (Ext D-1) for a period of five years. The defendants further pleaded that they have acquired the rights of Bhumiswami by operation of law and cannot be ejected from their lawful possession.

( 4 ) THE trial Court after framing the issues and recording the evidence of the parties, dismissed the suit of the plaintif













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top