S.K.SETH, P.C.PATHAK, S.AWASTHY
DANIEL JOHN – Appellant
Versus
RAJMAYA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by the District Judge, Sagar for confirmation u/s. 17 of Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) of decree nisi passed by him u/s. 14 of the Act, dissolving the marriage between the parties.
( 2 ) THE petitioner/husband filed the petition under S. 10 of the Act for dissolution of marriage which took place on 7-5-1975, according to the custom prevalent amongst the Christians. After marriage both lived together in Naya Mohalla Ward of Sagar. As a result of wedlock, the respondent gave birth to male child by name Manish, now aged about four years, The petitioner is employed in Armed Force and is also a Hockey Player. In connection with his duties, he remained out of Sagar. After successful completion of training, the petitioner was permitted to keep his family with him at the place of posting. The petitioner requested the respondent to accompany him, but the respondent declined. Meanwhile, the respondent was employed as a clerk in Irrigation Department of the State and started earning a salary of Rs. 400/- per month. In March 1978 both had decided to go to Kamti, but to his utter surprise, when he reached his house on 27-3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.