SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 31

P.C.PATHAK
LAHARAM – Appellant
Versus
MELAN BAI – Respondent


P. C. PATHAK, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant/husband has tiled this petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the order passed by the Courts below awarding maintenance of Rs. 100/- per month to the non-applicant.

( 2 ) THE married mere married long back and as a result of the wedlock, the non-applicant gave birth to five children, out of which four are with the applicant and one Sitabai is with the non-applicant. Sometime in 1983, the applicant turned her out when she was carrying pregnancy of the child Sitabai. The applicant intended to marry another woman. She, therefore, through a written notice (Ex. P-i), demanded maintenance. On account of noncompliance, she filed the petition claiming Rs. 200/- per month for self and Rs. 100/- per month for the child.

( 3 ) THE applicant/husband opposed the application on various grounds, including the ground of adultery. According to him, the non-applicant is leading adulterous life with one Jagdish. The applicant also raised the plea of divorce in a caste panchayat and, therefore, be was free to so in for second marriage.

( 4 ) THE learned trial Court, on assessment of evidence, held that the non-applicant was living










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top