SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 335

RAM PAL SINGH, B.C.VARMA
ROOPSINGH – Appellant
Versus
LICENCING AUTHORITY/district MAGISTRATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Tiwari

RAMPAL SINGH, J. ( 1 ) BY this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner pray for issuance of appropriate writ directing respondents 1 and 3 to renew the cinema licence in their favour for operating Mahabir Talkies, Tikamgarh.

( 2 ) THE present petitioners, on 28-2-1984, applied to the District Magistrate, Tikamgarh for renewal of the cinema licence of Mahabir Talkies for the year 1984-85. The respondent 2 also filed an application on 6-1-1984 before the same authority contending that he has a share in the said talkies and, therefore, the licence in the name of the petitioners be not renewed. The respondent 2 further contended that he is also owner of Mahabir Talkies. In the light of these rival contentions, the District Magistrate, after hearing both the parties passed an order on 23-8-1984 holding that there was sufficient proof that respondent 2 has half share in Mahabir Talkies. The District Magistrate further held that petitioner 1 should get his right and ownership of Mahabir Talkies declared within a month from the date of the order and then after a month the question of renewal shall be considered. Aggrieved by this order of the District Magistrate










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top