T.N.SINGH
G. NIRMAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA – Appellant
Versus
VASANTRAO – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal has been heard expeditiously because an order passed under O. 7, R. 11 (d), C. P. C. by the trial Court is impugned by the plaintiff-appellant. Court below has taken the view that the suit was barred by the provisions of S. 82 read with S. 64 (1) (e) of the M. P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for short the Act.
( 2 ) REJECTION of a plaint is indeed contemplated under Cl. (d) of R. 11 of O. 7, C. P. C. , where "the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law". This would mean, according to me, that parties are not at issue in such a case and indeed the question merely is of law and no investigation into any fact is necessary. Indeed, if the "law" by which exclusion of Civil Court's jurisdiction is contemplated, on its face manifests the requirement of investigation into any fact then there would be no scope for passing order under Cl. (d) aforementioned. In such a case, no leap-frog procedure can be adopted by the trial Court to efface or obliterate the right contemplated under O. 14, C. P. C. , under which parties are allowed to raise "issue" and to call for decision of the trial Court on issues so framed. Indeed, the am
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.