K.L.SHRIVASTAVA, P.D.MULYE
KARURAM – Appellant
Versus
OMPRAKASH – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant Karuram who is the husband of the victim Nandibai and their three sons, one of them Parasram then a minor aged 12 years filed a claim petitioner on 2-7-79 against the driver, the owner and the insurer of the vehicle claiming Rs. 51,500/- as compensation alleging that the accident was occasioned due to the negligence of the driver of the truck and that Nandibai and the young one of a buffalo died as a result thereof.
( 3 ) THE respondents contested the claim. According to the driver, the accident was occasioned by a police jeep and he has been falsely involved. The quantum of compensation was also assailed.
( 4 ) ON the material placed by the parties, on record, the learned Tribunal has held that the accident was due to negligence and the deceased was working as a labourer and was contributing to the extent of Rs. 4/- per day for the family. Applying a multiplier of 10, the appellants were held entitled to Rs. 14,400/- a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.