P.D.MULYE, S.K.DUBEY
STATE – Appellant
Versus
ASHADEVI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal under S. 110d of Motor Vehicles Act 1939 shall also govern the disposal of other ten Misc. Appeals No. 256/84 (State of M. P. v. Smt. Premlatabai Wd/o Shivpratapsingh), 258/84 (State of M. P. v. Jeetendra Kumar Singh, Minor through guardian Rameshwar Singh) 259/84 (State of M. P. v. Shahjadi Wd/o Shahid Khan, 260/84 (State of M. P. v. Deceased Mulayamsingh through legal representative Smt. Satyawati Wd/o Mulayamsingh), 261/84 (State of M. P. and another v. Jeet Singh), 262/84 (State of M. P. v. Ramlathetsingh), 263/84 (State of M. P. and another v. Jaiveersingh), 264/84 (State of M. P. and another v. Babulal) and 265/84 (State of M. P. v. Lachha and another ).
( 2 ) IN appeals No. 255/84. 257/84, 258/84. 259/84 and 260/84, the claimants are the legal representatives of the deceased constables, who died in the Motor Accident of Police vehicle No. MPP 2294, which was coming back from Alirajpur to Jhabua on 18-2-83, Remaining claimants are the injured persons, who received grievous and severe injuries in the said motor accident. The pleading in respect of rash and negligent driving of the vehicle are almost the same in all the claim petitions. About 3
Referred to : Narcinva V. Kamat v. Alfredo Antonio Doe Martins
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Pista Aggarwal
Kashmiran Mathur v. Sardar Rajendrasingh
Referred to : Pushpabai Purshottam Udeshi v. M/s. Ranjit Ginning and Pressing Co. Ltd.
Narcinva V. Kamat v. Alfredo Antonio Doe Martins
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.