SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 94

K.L.SHRIVASTAVA
RADHABAI – Appellant
Versus
ARJUNDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.S.SISODIYA, P.P.Joshi

K. L. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition u/s. 23-E of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') is directed against the order dated 14-7-87 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore (for short Art 'the authority' ).

( 2 ) CIRCUMSTANCES giving rise to this petition are these. Smt. Radhabai, the petitioner on 15-1-86 filed an application u/s. 23-A of the Act against the non-applicant before the authority for his eviction from the accommodation situate at Indore. She had let out the same to him after her widowhood.

( 3 ) BY the impugned order the learned Authority has held that the application has to be transferred to the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction on the ground that the petitioner is not included in the category of the 'landlord' contemplated in S. 23-J of the Act as the accommodation had been let out to the non-applicant after she had become a widow. Reliance for this view was placed on the decision in Badri Prasad's case (1987 MPRCJ 66) which relates to a retired Govt. servant.

( 4 ) THE contention of the petitioner's learned counsel is that the learned authority was wrong in placing reliance on the decision in Badri Prasad's case (s










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top