SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 39

T.N.SINGH
BHAROSILAL – Appellant
Versus
SHILADEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Gupta, K.N.Gupta

T. N. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs appeal whose suit for redemption of mortgage of their house has been decreed by the trial Court. In this appeal they have assailed the direction of the trial Court requiring the plaintiffs to pay to the defendant the sum of Rs. 10,000/- being the sum advanced by the defendant as loan which was secured by the mortgage.

( 2 ) THE short question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether the preliminary decree which is impugned is legal and valid inasmuch as it is not drawn up in accordance with R. 7 of O. 34 of the Civil P. C. In other words, whether there should have been a direction first for an account being taken of what was due to the defendant at the date of the decree for principal and interest on the mortgage and thereafter a declaration ought to have been made of the amount if any, to be paid to the defendant. Indeed, it is contended in this appeal that the mortgagors/plaintiffs have paid a total amount of Rs. 28,000/- towards principal amount and interest due under the mortgage and as such they were entitled to refund of the amount illegally realised from them by the defendant/ mortgagee and that there could be no direction ag

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top