SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 224

V.D.GYANI
DHARMRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jaisingh, S.S.SWAMI

V. D. GYANI, J.

( 1 ) - The appellant has been convicted under section 161, IPC and under section 5 (1) (d) read with section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of Rs. 1,000/- or rigorous imprisonment for six months in lieu of payment of fine.

( 2 ) SHORT facts of the case are: that the appellant at the material time was posted as an Upper Division Clerk, Grade-I, in the Municipal Corporation, Ujjain and was working in the town planning branch vide order dated 4. 7. 81, Ex. P. 12, Issued by the Corporation Commissioner. It was his duty to process and deal with applications for sanction of building maps and plans. On 18. 8. 1981, complainant Ajher Ahmed approached him (the appellant) with three applications for sanction of buildingmaps of (1) Abdul Hamid Hatim, (2) Smt. Premlatabai and (3) Smt. Bhuribai. The accused- appellant demanded an illegal gratification of Rs. 5/- for each application, for processing and forwarding the same for sanction of building-map by concerned authority. The complainant Ajher Ahmed Khan and his brother, who is a licenced draughts man, were not willing to give any such bribe to t

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top