SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 16

T.N.SINGH, B.M.LAL
RADHEY SHYAM SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, SEWARRIHA SAHAKARI SAMITI LASHKAT, GWALIOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.G.Apte, G.Dixit, M.C.Jain

T. N. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) BY this Order we propose to dispose of eight petitions. Other seven, besides this, are ; Misc. Petitions Nos. 1293, 1307, 1311, 1312, 1313, 1365 and 1367 of 1988 Indeed, in these several petitions we have taken the view that the preliminary objection to their maintainability has to be upheld.

( 2 ) IN all these matters the common factual premise is that petitioners in each case made bid to be nominated for election in different Co-operative societies. Their nomination papers having been rejected, they have come before us with the common complaint that the election process in each case is vitiated in the particular facts and circumstances of each case. However, the fortuitous circumstance dominating the common complaint to be read in each of these cases is that in each case there was a large number of nomination papers more than the number of seats to be filled up. After scrutiny had taken place, the number of nomination papers which were found valid conformed in number to the seats to be filled up. As a result, the persons whose nomination papers had been found valid were declared elected unopposed.

( 3 ) WHILE entertaining these petitions doubt was entertaine












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top