FAIZAN UDDIN, Y.B.SURYAVANSHI
CM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 1215 of 1984 shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 1191 of 1984 (Nabbu Narbad v. State of M. P.), since both the appeals arise out of the judgment dated 1/10/1984 by the Fourth A. S. I. , Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No. 124 of 1984. The appellants in the above appeals are Om Prakash and Nabbu Narbad, respectively. Both have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo R. I. for life. Furthermore, both have been convicted under Sections 294 and 506-11 of the Indian Penal Code, each has been sentenced to undergo two months and six months R. I. , respectively, with a direction that the sentences shall be concurrent.
( 2 ) BESIDES these two appellants, one Santosh Santhosh Kumar, was also tried in the said irial, but he has been acquitted of the charge under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, though convicted under Sections 294/506 and 506-11 of the Indian Penal Code and also sentenced to undergo two months and six months R. I. respectively. It seems that there is no appeal preferred by him.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution, dated on 25/12/19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.