SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 231

B.C.VARMA, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
RATIRAM SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL, GOVT. POLYTECHNIC, HARDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.CHOUBE, P.C.Naik

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THE order passed in this petition shall also govern the disposal of M. P. No. 411/88 (Omshankar Chanderi and others v. Madhya Pradesh Technical Education Board, through its Secretary and another ).

( 2 ) THE petitioners who are students of Govt. Polytechnic, Harda, being an institution under the Madhya Pradesh Board of Technical Education, Bhopal, have all been rusticated and debarred from appearing in the examinations conducted by the Board, by way of disciplinary action against them for their disorderly behaviour in the examination hall. All the petitioners have a common grievance that disciplinary action of debarring them from the examination, by way of punishment, has been taken against them by the Principal of the Institution and by the Board of Technical Education, without affording them any opportunity to show cause against the penal action.

( 3 ) THE petitioner Ratiram Singh Yadav in M. P. No. 271/88 has come forward with a specific grievance that he never appeared in the supplementary examination held in Sept.-Oct. 1987, because he had already passed the examination in April-May, 1987. He also denied that he ever misbehaved during the examinat










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top