SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 84

FAIZAN UDDIN
SHYAM NARAYAN TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.M.A.NAZANI, V.K.Saxena

FAKHRUDDIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under S. 482, Cr. P. C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is practising Advocate of Ashoknagar (Guna), for expunging the remarks given against him by the trial Court, while rejecting his application for adjournment, vide impugned order dated 29-5-2000.

( 2 ) THE impugned order dated 29-5-2000 was passed by the trial Court in a Criminal Misc. Case No. 64/95 (State of M. P. v. Sukka and others), in which an application was made by the present petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of self-illness, which was rejected by the impugned order and certain remarks were also passed against the petitioner/advocate. The trial Court in the impugned order aforesaid also noted that the counsel has not been appearing from 9-3-1996 onwards and nor he has filed memo of appearance on the record. While rejecting the application, the following remarks were passed by the trial Court as under :-

( 3 ) SHRI Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was the counsel and he was appearing on behalf of the accused-persons, and he had filed the memo. It is submitted that on 29-5-2000 since the applicant himself was sick, he could n











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top