FAIZAN UDDIN
SHYAM NARAYAN TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition under S. 482, Cr. P. C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is practising Advocate of Ashoknagar (Guna), for expunging the remarks given against him by the trial Court, while rejecting his application for adjournment, vide impugned order dated 29-5-2000.
( 2 ) THE impugned order dated 29-5-2000 was passed by the trial Court in a Criminal Misc. Case No. 64/95 (State of M. P. v. Sukka and others), in which an application was made by the present petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of self-illness, which was rejected by the impugned order and certain remarks were also passed against the petitioner/advocate. The trial Court in the impugned order aforesaid also noted that the counsel has not been appearing from 9-3-1996 onwards and nor he has filed memo of appearance on the record. While rejecting the application, the following remarks were passed by the trial Court as under :-
( 3 ) SHRI Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was the counsel and he was appearing on behalf of the accused-persons, and he had filed the memo. It is submitted that on 29-5-2000 since the applicant himself was sick, he could n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.