SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 142

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
R. S. Garg
BHIM MOHD. - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 2653 Of 2000
Decided On : 02/28/2001

Advocates Appeared:
N.K.SHUKLA, Tiwari Kishore Bhaduri, Yashwant

Headnote:(i) Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 26 - Confession and its admissibility - Confessional statement made in presence of police while accused is in custody - Same would be inadmissible in evidence. (Para 28)

       (ii) Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 8 - Motive - In a case based on circumstantial evidence presence of motive strengthens prosecution case - Court has to consider and see whether it was adequate – Mere existence of motive by itself is not an incriminating circumstance Motive is not an indispensable link in chain of circumstantial evidence. (Para 45)

       (iii) Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114 - Presumption - Court may presume existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened in common course of natural events and human conduct Presumption is an inference of fact drawn from other known or proved facts - Presumptions help in determining probative force of evidence by bringing estimation of probative force under some inflexible rules. (Para 49)

       (iv) Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 302 - Appellant convicted for murder of his mother and death sentence awarded by trial Court Body of deceased recovered in pieces from various places - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Confession made by accused in presence of police official was inadmissible in evidence - Motive for commission of crime was alleged gift of land made by deceased - No evidence that gift infact was made - Head and stump of deceased were alleged to have been recovered at instance of accused but memorandum of accused under Section 27 of Evidence Act was prepared subsequent to recovery Weapons of offence got recovered by accused were found not stained with blood - Small stain of blood on Kurta of accused would not provide a positive foundation for raising a presumption against accused Court below was unjustified in convicting appellant and it was liable to be set aside. (Paras 47, 49, 50 and 56 to 59)

       (v) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Death sentence - Award of life sentence is general rule and only special reasons would warrant passing of capital punishment - Guidelines laid in Bachhan Singh's case - Disposal of body in a particular manner could not provide a foundation for awarding capital punishment. (Paras 61 to 63)

       Result: Appeal allowed.

       

R. S. GARG, J.

( 1 ) - This is a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Khairagarh (Sessions Division Rajanandgaon) in Sessions trial No. 64/2000, vide its judgment dated 29-9-2000, finding the accused guilty under Section 302. I. P. C. has awarded extreme penalty! capital punishment. The accused being aggrieved by the judgment and sentences awarded to him has filed Criminal Appeal No. 2653/2000 challenging the correctness, propriety and validity of the judgment and the findings recorded by it.

( 2 ) THIS judgment shall dispose of Criminal Reference No. 1/2000 and Criminal Appeal No. 2653/2000.

( 3 ) THE charge against the accused is that in between 9th October, 1999 and 13th October, 1999 he committed murder of his mother Khwajan Bi and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 302, I. P. C. The accused was also charged for an offence punishable under Section 201, I. P. C. on the ground that to cause disappearance of the material evidence; after cutting the body of his mother into pieces, he packed the same in different bags, threw some bags in a rivulet (Nala) and some were burned in a pit used for stacking placing the cow-dung.

( 4 ) THE prosecution case in brief is that on 13-10-1999 Sheikh Mohd. P. W. 7 (Son of the accused) and Mohd. Chand (first cousin of accused) informed the police that Sheikh Mohd. had gone to his in-laws place on 3-10-1999 after his return on 11-10-1999 when he came to his house he found that his grand-mother Khwajan Bi was missing since 9-10-1999 and her where-abouts were not known to anybody. He also reported that Khwajan Bi was a vegetable vendor, who left some tomatoes with Shyambai who informed him that Khwajan Bi was not traceable. He also informed police that people were whispering in the village that some parts of the body were lying in a rivulet on that he along with Mohd. Chand. Azmal and one Rathore went to the spot where he found a piece of right hand which was wearing some ornaments and at some distance a leg was lying. He informed the police that after identifying the said ornaments he was convinced that the pieces of the body recovered were of his grand motherts body. He also informed the police that at some distance a bag was lying under water, from which bad smell was coming. The said information was recorded at marg No. 13/99 on 13-10-1999 at about 11. 50 p. m. The said recorded information has been exhibited as Ex. P115. After receiving the information nothing was done on 13-10-1999, but the police officer came to the said rivulet on 14-10-1999. He recovered the pieces of the leg and hand which were identified by Sheikh Mohd. and Mohd. Chand. Seizure of the said articles were effected, thereafter, Dehati-nalishi was lodged by P. W. 1 Mohd. Chand. Memo of corpus (Naksha Panchayat Nama of the dead body) was prepared; first information report was registered; on information received from the accused remaining parts of the body were recovered from a pit and almost at the same time an axe, sickle and Kurta (long shirt) belonging to the accused were recovered.

( 5 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution the accused had some differences with his, own mother because she had gifted or given away some part of the agricultural land to her daughter i. e. sister of the accused. The accused taking an exception to conduct of his mother was publicly saying that some day he would murder his mother and cut her into pieces. On 14-10-1999 the accused was arrested. After recovery of different pieces of the body, same were sent for post mortem. The doctor opined that cause of death was asphyxia due to throttling and body was cut into pieces after the death of the deceased.

( 6 ) ON completion of the investigation, finding that every needle of allegation was pointing towards the guilt of the accused. a challan was filed against him. The learned trial Judge framed the charges as referred to above against the accused and put him to trial.



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top