FAIZAN UDDIN
ANTIL KUMAR HARITWAL – Appellant
Versus
SANT PRAKASH GUPTA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of all the aforesaid three revision- petitions.
( 2 ) CRI. Revn. 344 and 412 of 2000 have been filed against the order dated 29-8-2000, passed by the trial Court whereby the application moved under Section 142-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, hereinafter referred to 'n. I. Act', where under the objection raised regarding competency to file complaint by a person in question has been rejected and the complaint was held to be maintainable, taking cognizance in the matter.
( 3 ) THE facts of Crl. Revn. No. 344/2000 are that the complainant Sant Prakash Gupta had made a complaint under Sec. 138 of the N. I. Act, as per Annexure P/1, against the petitioners-accused on the ground that the petitioners/accused took a loan in the sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- from the respondent/complainant through cheque No. 485117, dated 11-6-96 and in lieu thereof they had executed a promissory note in favour of the complainant to the effect that on demand they will return the payment of loan with interest as determined between the parties. The amount was to be returned after twelve months. It was alleged that the amount of interest alone was paid by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.