SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 309

V.K.AGRAWAL
CHANDRASEN SHIVLAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SURESH CHAND GULAB JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.C.JAIN, P.Asati

V. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the impugned order dated 1/12/2000 in Civil suit No. 286-A/99 by IIIrd Civil Judge Class-ii, Bhopal, whereby the application under order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code of defendant/petitioner has been rejected.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for eviction against the petitioner/tenant. The suit is being resisted by the defendant/ petitioner, who filed his written statement after seeking several adjournments in that regard. The plaintiffs/respondents in para 3 of the plaint (Annexure A-1) pleaded that the suit property was the ancestral property of plaintiffs, and initially Dwarka Prasad was inducted in the suit premises as tenant. It was further pleaded that after the death of original tenant Dwarka Prasad, the defendant/petitioner inherited the tenancy rights in the suit premises. It was also pleaded that in the family partition of plaintiffs, the suit property was allotted in the share of Choudhary Gulab Chand Jain. The plaintiff/respondent No. 1 succeeded to the property by virtue of Will dated 28/10/1998, executed by Choudhary Qulab chand Jain and that he is the sole owner and landlord of the suit propert











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top