SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 590

S.P.KHARE
DHANANJAN BISEN – Appellant
Versus
DEVI BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.Jha, UMESH TRIVEDI

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendant's second appeal under Section 100, C. P. C. Arguments on the question of admission heard.

( 2 ) THE dispute is in respect of eight feet wide passage on the western side of the houses belonging to the plaintiffs as shown in the map annexed to the plaint and also in the map Ex. P-8. It is admitted that Ramchand was originally the owner of the land and he sold plots to different persons. Ex. P-3 is certified copy of registered sale deed dated 22-2-1956 executed by Ramchand in favour of Motilal. In this sale deed it is mentioned (vernacular matter omitted ). The plaintiffs are the successors-in-title of Motilal. Ramchand sold the land on the western side of the plot of Motilal to the defendant's father by registered sale deed dated 2-12-1957 (Ex. D-3) including the land on which right of way was granted to Motilal.

( 3 ) THE trial Court after considering the documentary and oral evidence of both the sides held in para 9 of its judgment that Ramchand had granted right of way to Motilal on eight feet wide land but this was a licence given to Motilal and it stood revoked when Ramchand sold that land to the father of the defendant. The first appellate





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top