SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 784

R.B.DIXIT
RAJESH KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SWAROOP CHAND JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, MUKUND BHARDVAJ, R.D.Jain, Sangam Jain

R. B. DIXIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall also govern disposal of Cr. Revision Nos. 105/01, 106/01, 107/01, 108/01 and 110/2001 as all the revisions have been preferred against same order and also on common question of facts and law.

( 2 ) VARIOUS complaints leading to aforesaid revisions were filed against respondent Swaroop Chand Jain and others under Sections 138 and 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act stating therein that M/s. S. K. G. Solvex is a company registered under Companies Act and Swaroop Chand Jain is its Director, who is responsible for its act. This company had purchased yellow Soyabeen from the complainant, for which certain amount of cheque was issued in favour of complainant by another co-accused Jitendra Kumar Jain. However, these cheques were dishonoured, for which statutory notices as required under sub-clause (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were served and then the complaints were filed.

( 3 ) THE respondent Swaroop Chand moved two applications under Sections 245 (2) and 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying therein for his discharge on the ground that he has resigned from the directorship of the said company on 28-3-96 and further that









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top