SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 331

S.K.PANDE
AMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, BHOPAL – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR NIGAM, BHOPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY MISHRA, N.K.PATEL, Pushpendra Singh, S.L.Patel

( 1 ) THIS revision under Section 115 of CPC is directed against the order dated 19-11-2001 passed by VADJ, Bhopal in M. A. No. 3/00.

( 2 ) ON 18-10-1999 the petitioner submitted application for permission to make construction on land Khasra No. 26 area 2. 83 acres situated at Kohefija, Bhopal. Since respondent Corporation did not refuse permission within 30 days and hence permission deemed to have been granted under section 295 (3) of the M. P. Municipal corporation Act 1956 (for short the "act"), the petitioner in February, 2000 started construction work according to the map submitted vide application dated 18-10-1999. On 7-6-00 the Engineering department of the respondent Corporation served a notice under Section 307 (2) of the Act requiring the petitioner to demolish the said construction. The notice was duly replied by the petitioner, but the respondent threatened to demolish the construction if the same has not been demolished by 13-6-00. Against the said notice the petitioner filed an appeal before the I ADJ, Bhopal. In the aforesaid appeal the respondent filed documents and from these the petitioner came to know by letter No. 44 dated 3-6-00 that his application for permiss









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top