SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 103

S.L.JAIN
PREMLAL ALIAS PREM NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


( 1 ) APPELLANT Dhoor Singh stands convicted for offence punishable under Section 366, IPC and sentence to R. I. for five years with fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default whereof to R. 1. for three months. He has further been convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (f), IPC and sentenced to R. 1. for ten years with fine of rs. 2000/-, in default whereof to R. I. for one year, vide the impugned judgment and order dated 26-5-2001 passed by Sessions Judge, Raisen in Sessions Trial no. 128/2000.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case in brief is that on 22-6-2000, prosecutrix Dhanno alias dhanwati (PW-4) had gone to forest to collect Gullis. She was accompanied by saraswati alias Ghuttal (PW-3) and Bhuriya bai (PW-2 ). At about 2. 30 p. m. when the three girls were collecting Gullis, appellant dhoor Singh reached there. He was armed with bow and arrows. He caught hold of the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix pulled her hands and tried to escape. The other girls accompanying her also tried to escape but the appellant did not allow the prosecutrix to escape and again caught hold her hands. The appellant threatened the prosecutrlx to shoot her. Dhanwati was badly frightened due to threats of the a































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top