SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 43

S.L.JAIN
LAKHANLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


S. L. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by appellant Lakhan Lai challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and order dated 15-5-2001, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 376 (1), 366 and 506, Part II of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to R. I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 1,000. 00, R. I. for five years with fine of Rs. 300. 00 and R. I. for one year with fine of Rs. 100. 00, respectively. All the above sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE prosecution story unfolded during the trial is that in the intervening night of 7th and 8th April, 2000 prosecutrix Swati was sleeping in her house. Her parents and siblings were also sleeping in the house. At about 3 a. m. appellant armed with an axe entered the house of prosecutrix. He collected her wearing apparels and caught hold of her hand and took her with him. He gave threat to the prosecutrix that if she will shout, she will be done to death. He took her from village Kuntha to village Jamthi on foot. From village Jamthi they boarded in a truck and reached Deshgaon. Appellant went on giving threats




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top