SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 781

DIPAK MISRA, A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
BABLU ABDUL AKHTAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.Nema, S.K.Rai

A. K. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by appellants against their judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Trial Court under section 376 (2) (g) and 366 of the Indian Penal Code (in short the IPC) as well as under section 3 (ii) (v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) IN brief the case of prosecution is that prosecutrix is a member of scheduled tribe community being a Gond and she happens to reside with her widow mother Kalabai. On 26/1/1996 at 8 p. m. the prosecutrix was inside her Tapra with her mother, at that juncture accused persons entered in the Tapra and forcibly took away the prosecutrix with them. The accused persons kept prosecutrix in night inside a room and committed rape on her. The mother, though searched the prosecutrix, but later on came back. On 27/1/1996 at 12. 35 p. m. , the mother of prosecutrix lodged First Information Report narrating the entire episode. Next day, the prosecutrix anyhow escaped and she came to her Tapra. The police, after recording her statement under section 161, Criminal Procedure Code sent the prosecutrix for medica



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top