S.SAMVATSAR
GIRRAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision is filed by the applicants accused challenging an order dated 11/4/2000 passed by Special Judge, Guna in case No. 39/98 S. I. whereby the Special Judge has transferred the matter to the concerned Magistrate for proceeding with the committal proceedings. Counsel for applicants submits that the said order is illegal and contrary to law.
( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that a complaint was filed against the applicants accused for committing offence under Sections 302/34 and 3 (1) (10) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Said compaint was registered as crime No. 1-9-1998. Challan was filed by the prosecution directly before the Sessions Court, Guna and was not committed to the said court according to the provisions of law. Apex Court in the case of Gangula Ashok and another v. State of AP has laid down that the cognizance of offence under the Atrocities Act cannot be taken by the Special Court without being committing to that court by the Magistrate and a complaint or charge-sheet cannot be straightway filed to the Special Court.
( 3 ) COUNSEL for the applicant has also relied on the judgment of Apex court in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.