SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 918

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
BADRI PRASAD PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Tamrakar, K.K.Pandey, SURENDRA SINGH

( 1 ) THESE two appeals have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by trial court convicting appellants under Ss. 460/ 34 and 397/34, I. P. C. Apart from the said conviction, appellants have been further convicted under Ss. 323/34, I. P. C. Both the appellants have been sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment under Ss. 460/34, i. P. C. as well as under Ss. 397/34, I. P. C. Apart from these sentences, both the appellants have been sentenced for one year R. I. under Ss. 323/34, I. P. C.

( 2 ) IN brief the case of prosecution is that in the locality of civil line of Panna, Dr. Hemant Sinha and Dr. Veena Sinha are having a hospital-cum-residential building. In the night of 28-6-2001 (2. 30 a. m.) P. D. S. Bundela Station Officer In-charge was patrolling in the city, at that juncture he heard the hue and cry coming from the house of dr. Hemant Sinha, as a result of which he entered in the house to enquire the matter, where Dehati Nalishi (Ex. P-7) was lodged by Dr. Hemant Sinha that he heard some whisper, as a result of which he woke up and noticed that some person is inside his house, he was under impression that person may be his son Tanmay,



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top