SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 354

K.K.LAHOTI
SURYA PRASAD SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSIONReferred To | Cited At – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK TIVARI

[REFERRED TO ] Go To Cited At

SHIV SHAKTI CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY NAGPUR VS. SWARAJ DEVELOPERS

(1)2003-AIR(SC)-0-2434 (2)2003-SCC-6-659 Referred to

SURYA DEV RAI VS. RAM CHANDER RAI

(1)2003-AIR(SC)-0-3044 (2)2003-SCC-6-675 Referred to

SWETAMBAR STHANAKWASI JAIN SAMITI VS. ALLEGED COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SRI R J I COLLEGE AGRA

(1)1996-AIR(SC)-0-1209 (2)1996-SCC-3-11 Referred to

DURGA PRASHAD VS. NAVEENCHANDRA

(1)1996-SCC-3-300 (2)1996-JT-3-564 Referred to

[CITED AT] Go To Referred To


Referred To | Cited At

2006-AIR (MP)-0-81 , 2006 (TLS)1404815

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Coram : K. K. LAHOTI

W. P. 912 Of 2005

(MARCH 10, 2005)

SURYA PRASAD SHUKLA VS. M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION

( 1 ) PETITIONER has sought following reliefs in this petition :-1 ). That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the impugned order dt. 24-1-2005 (Annx. P/6) passed by the first respondent and restore that of the order dated 1-3-2004 (Ann. P/4) by issuance of orders, directions, writs in the nature of certiorari or mandamus or any other writ deems fit in the circumstances of the case. 2 ). Any other relief deems fit in the circumstances of the case including cost of the proceeding ma













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top