SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 652

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, A.M.SAPRE
PRAMODCHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
ASHWANI ARORA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Goyal, G.K.Neema

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, C. J.

( 1 ) AS these two appeals arise from the same judgment -one by the claimants (M. A. No. 947 of 2001) and other by the insurance company (M. A. No. 912 of 2001), they are heard together by consent and disposed of by this common judgment. As the ranks of the parties in the two appeals differ, the parties will be referred to by their ranks in the claim petitions.

( 2 ) THE claimants are the husband and two minor children of one Dr. Shobha shukla, who died in a motor accident on 20. 3. 1999 caused on account of negligence of the driver of truck bearing No. MP 09-D 7008 (of which respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are respectively the owner, driver and insurer ). Deceased was 39 years old and was working as Assistant Professor in chemistry in Government Post Graduate college, Mhow. She was a postgraduate in science and held a doctorate in chemistry. Her basic pay at the time of death was rs. 10,475 and with allowances, her total salary was Rs. 13,827. The claimants filed the Claim Case No. 157 of 1999 claiming a compensation of Rs. 50,00,000 before the motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mhow.

( 3 ) AFTER appreciating the evidence the tribunal by judgment and award dated 8














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top