SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 646

N.K.MODY
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
GOKULCHAND AND SONS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANISH JAIN, V.VIJAY VARGIYA

( 1 ) BEING aggrieved by the order dated 21-7-2003 passed in MJC No. 31/ 2003 by District Judge, Ujjain, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for review of judgment and decree dated 31-1-2003 passed by District Judge, Ujjain in Civil Suit no. 1-B/2000 was allowed, the present revision has been filed.

( 2 ) SHORT facts of the case are that respondents filed the suit for declaration and injunction towards illegal recovery cf central Excise Duty on the goods sold against the petitioner. The suit was opposed by the present petitioners on various grounds, including on the ground that the matter relates to recovery of excise under the provisions of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, hence, in view of S. 11-B (5 ). the Civil Court is having no jurisdiction. It was prayed that suit be dismissed. Learned Court below framed the issues and vide judgment and decree dated 21-7-2003 dismissed the suit on account of want of jurisdiction. Thereafter on 31-1-2003 an application for review was filed under S. 161, C. P. C. for recalling of judgment and decree, which was numbered as 31/2003 MJC and was allowed vide order dated 31-7-2003, against which the present revision is filed.

( 3 ) L







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top