SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 112

DEEPAK VERMA, ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI
DILKHUSH – Appellant
Versus
BHERULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.V.DANDVATE, Sudhanshu Vyas

DEEPAK VERMA, ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI, JJ.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of claimants, against the award dated 12/9/2000, passed by Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandsaur, in m. V. Case No. 21 of 2000, whereby and wherein for death of one Siyaram, present appellants have been awarded a sum of rs. 2,00,000 together with interest against respondents jointly and severally.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is for enhancement. The respondent No. 3 has also filed a cross-objection on 2/2/2005, under Order 41, rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code. Since said cross-objections are barred by more than 3 years, it has also filed an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act.

( 3 ) WE have heard learned counsel for parties and perused record.

( 4 ) DECEASED Siyaram was travelling in a tractor-trolley bearing registration No. MP 14-G 4282 and MP 14-G 4283, respectively, on 16. 12. 1999. Said trolley was being used for transportation of soyabean from village Nataram to Mandsaur. According to claimants, Siyaram was working on the said trolley as a labourer for loading. Thus, he was entitled to travel thereon. Due to rash and negligent driving of tractor and trolley attached thereto, by respondent No. 2,







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top