SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 606

A.K.GOHIL
DHANRAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.MISHRA, M.K.JAIN, PRASHANT SHARMA, R.P.JOHRI, S.S.Rajput

( 1 ) THIS judgment shall govern the disposal of all the aforesaid appeals.

( 2 ) APPELLANT in Criminal Appeal No. 443/ s9 has been convicted under S. 3 (1) (4) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (Act for short)and sentenced to undergo six months' imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/ -. Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 14/01 has been convicted under S. 3 (1) (10) of the Act and sentenced to undergo six months R. I. and fine of Rs. 500/ -. Appellant in Criminal Appeal no. 649/98 has been convicted under S. 3 (1) (x)of the Act and S. 323, I. P. C. and sentanced to six months S. I. and fine of Rs. 700/-respectively.

( 3 ) SHORT facts of the case in Criminal appeal No. 443/99 are that complainant lodged a report that Government had provided him some land on Patta which he used to till. Appellant forcefully encroached upon the same and has sown Soyabean. On objection from complainant, appellant said "bhaag Ja Basod Nahin to Maaroonga" and started quarrelling. Facts of the case in Criminal Appeal No. 14/01 are that complainant is a member of scheduled Castes. On 9-9-1999 at 6 in the evening complainant went on Gagroo Ghat river to take bath and start








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top