SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 933

ARUN MISHRA, S.R.WAGHMARE
NARENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GOVIND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL LALA, Ashish Pathak, RAKESH JAIN

ARUN MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals have been preferred by the claimant, driver and the owner aggrieved by an award dated 13. 12. 2001 passed by the First Additional motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Khandwa in Claim Case No. 69 of 2000. The claimant has prayed for enhancement of compensation whereas driver and owner have preferred their appeals as insurer has been exonerated.

( 2 ) CLAIMANT Narendra Singh averred in claim petition that on 10. 1. 2000 at about 11. 15 a. m. , when he was standing in front of his house, the tractor-trolley bearing registration No. MP 10-A 3753 owned by inder, driven by Govind alias Nanhu came to the village Khajuri and asked for the way of agricultural field of Pyara Singh. At the request of Govind alias Nanhu, respondent No. 1, the driver of the said tractor, claimant Narendra Singh boarded the tractor-trolley loaded with the bricks which was to be unloaded in the field of pyara Singh. On the way to the agricultural land, Govind alias Nanhu drove the tractor in a rash and negligent manner owing to which, the trolley turned turtle. Claimant narendra Singh fell down and sustained injuries in his backbone. He has incurred permanent disability due to par













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top