SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 803

U.C.MAHESHWARI
MUNNALAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK TAPEKAR, J.K.Jain

U. C. MAHESHWARI, J.

( 1 ) CRIMINAL Revision No. 730/2000 is directed against the order dated 5. 5. 2000 passed by the special Court, SC and ST (Prevention of atrocities) Act (for short the 'act') in ST. No. 203/91 by which ST No. 85/92, State; of M. P. v. Jugraj Singh, was directed to be amalgamated with S. T. No. 203/91 by holding that both the session trials were arising out of the same incident and Cr. Rev. No. 730/2000 is directed against the order dated 12. 5. 2000 passed by the aforesaid court in S. T. No. 85/92 by which the application filed by petitioners under section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in brief the "code") has been dismissed. The facts giving rise to these petitions are that initially an offence was registered at Police Station Gotegaon and on investigation the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 namely Munnalal and Brijlal were charge-sheeted under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the case was committed to the Sessions Court. Subsequent to it, a private complaint was iniitiated against all petitioners regarding the same incident in which the cognisance under the aforesaid section of the Indian Penal Code was taken against them. In view of the provisi















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top