SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1077

U.C.MAHESHWARI
SHYAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Sharma, Ramesh Shukla

U. C. MAHESHWARI, J.

( 1 ) SHRI P. Sharma, learned Counsel for the applicants. Shri Ramesh Shukla, learned Dy. Govt. Adv. for respondent/state. This application is preferred under section 438, Criminal Procedure Code under the apprehension of the arrest of the applicants in the offence under sections 406, 294, 506-B read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code and under section 3 (l)x) of the Scheduled Castes and the scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short the "sc and ST act") vide Crime No. 152/05 registered at P. S. Cheechali, District Narsinghpur madhya Pradesh.

( 2 ) IT is said that complainant teekaram Chamar had taken the land of the applicants and their other family members at "advatai" and after taking such land he cultivated the same for the crops of Rahar, Wheat and Sugar Cane etc. but the same was taken by the applicants and their family members and it was not divided with the complainant according to their agreement. Subsequently it was demanded by the complainant then as alleged he was abused with the name of his caste then a report in writing was given to the authority by complainant, on which, the offence was registered and the matter is under i








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top