SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 76

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
MR. A. K. PATNAIK, C. J. MR. JUSTICE S. S. JHA
RANJEET SINGH - Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAN SINGH - Respondents
M. A. 88 Of 1999
Decided On : 01/12/2006

Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Gupta, Pravin Newaskar, R.A.Roman, Rajneesh Sharma, Shriniwas Gajendra Gadkar

The effective time of an insurance policy, as specified in the policy, determines the commencement of the contract of insurance and the liability of the insurance company for compensation.

Headnote:

Insurance - Motor Accident Claims - 29. 4. 1997 - New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Ram Dayal, 1990 ACJ 545 (SC), National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jikubhai Nathuji Dabhi, 1997 ACJ 351 (SC), Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunita Rathi, 1998 ACJ 121 (SC)

Fact of the Case:

The appeals were filed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Vidisha in Claim Case nos. 130, 131, 132, 150 and 157 of 1998. The issue revolved around the liability of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. for compensation to the claimants due to an accident involving a Tata 407 minibus.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the insurance policy issued on 29. 4. 1997 was to be effective from 2. 30 p. m. on that day, and not from the midnight of 28. 4. 1997 or from 11 a. m. on 29. 4. 1997. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision holding Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. not liable for compensation was upheld.

Issues: The main issue was the effective time of the insurance policy issued on 29. 4. 1997 and the liability of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. for compensation to the claimants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the legal principles established in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Ram Dayal, National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jikubhai Nathuji Dabhi, and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunita Rathi to determine the effective time of the insurance policy and the liability of the insurance company.

Final Decision: The appeals were allowed in part, with the court upholding the Tribunal's decision that Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. was not liable for the compensation towards the claimants.

A. K. PATNAIK, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE are all the appeals filed against the common award dated 21. 1. 1999 of the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, Vidisha in Claim Case nos. 130, 131, 132, 150 and 157 of 1998 by the owner of the vehicle which met with the accident.

( 2 ) THE facts briefly are that appellant no. 1 is the owner of Tata 407 minibus bearing registration No. MP 04-F 1923. Nandlal, Ramesh, Bhagwan Singh, Raja- ram and Khemchand amongst others were travelling in the said vehicle on 29. 4. 1997 when the vehicle overturned on the road and in the said accident, Nandlal, Ramesh, bhagwan Singh, Rajaram and Khemchand suffered injuries and they filed Claim Case nos. 130, 131, 132, 150 and 157 of 1998. In the said claim cases, the appellants took a stand that the aforesaid vehicle was insured with Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. on the date of accident. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. , on the other hand, took a plea that the vehicle was insured up to the midnight of 28. 4. 1997 and thereafter a fresh insurance policy was issued in respect of the vehicle and such fresh insurance policy was to commence from 2. 30 p. m. on 29. 4. 1997, whereas the accident took place at 1 p. m. on 29. 4. 1997 and, therefore, it was not liable for compensation under the fresh policy of insurance issued on 29. 4. 1997. After considering the documentary evidence produced and oral evidence adduced by the parties, the Tribunal awarded different sums as compensation in the aforesaid claim cases by the impugned award dated 21. 1. 1999 holding that Oriental Insurance co. Ltd. was not liable for the said compensation and instead the appellant, who was the owner of the vehicle was liable for the said compensation.

( 3 ) MR. K. N. Gupta, the senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Pravin Newaskar, advocate for the appellants, submitted that it will be clear from the oral evidence of naws 4 and 5 that the representative of the appellant-owner went to the office of oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. on 29. 4. 1997 at about 11 a. m. and paid the insurance premium for the policy and that in fact, the policy of insurance which was issued on 29. 4. 1997 did not contain any time from which the policy of insurance was to commence on 29. 4. 1997 but the officers of the insurance company appeared to have put the time 2. 30 p. m. ' on the copy of the insurance policy retained by them. Mr. Gupta submitted, relying on the judgment of the Apex Court in New India Assurance co. Ltd. v. Ram Dayal, 1990 ACJ 545 (SC), that the policy of insurance that was issued in respect of the vehicle on 29. 4. 97 would commence from the midnight of 28. 4. 1997. Alternatively, he submitted that the policy of insurance issued on 29. 4. 1997 would at least be effective from 11 a. m. on 29. 4. 1997 when the insurance premium was paid and since the accident took place at 1 p. m. on 29. 4. 1997, it was the insurance company which was liable to indemnify the appellant for the compensation amounts payable to the claimants.

( 4 ) MR. Shriniwas Gajendra Gadkar, the learned counsel appearing for Oriental insurance Co. Ltd. , on the other hand, submitted that the insurance policy and the certificate of insurance had been produced and marked as exhibits before the Tribunal. He submitted that Tata 407 minibus of the appellant was insured by Oriental Insurance co. Ltd. from 10 a. m. on 29. 4. 1996 to midnight of 28. 4. 1997, as would be clear from exh. D3 and, therefore, the policy of insurance that was issued for the earlier period expired on the midnight of 28. 4. 1997. He further submitted that the fresh policy of insurance issued in respect of the aforesaid vehicle specifically stipulated that policy commenced from 2. 30 p. m. on 29,4. 1997 and would be valid up to the midnight of 28. 4. 1998. He argued that since a specific time of 2. 30 p. m. was mentioned, the policy would commence from 2. 30 p. m. on 29. 4. 1997, whereas the accident took place at 1 p. m. on 29. 4. 1997 and insurance company was not liable to pay compen










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top