SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 373

S.L.JAIN
AADITYA KHARE – Appellant
Versus
JAMUNA PRASAD KAHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brijesh Mishra, PRANAY VERMA

S. L. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) INVOKING the appellate jurisdiction of this court under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'), Aaditya Khare, non-applicant no. 1, has challenged the legality, validity, propriety and correctness of the award dated 20. 2. 1998, passed by Fourth Additional motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, rewa in Claim Case No. 24 of 1997.

( 2 ) THE facts of this case, as have been unfolded, in nutshell are that the respondent nos. 1 to 3 have filed a petition under section 166 of the Act stating that they are the legal representatives of deceased Sudama prasad. On 26. 7. 1991 deceased Sudama prasad along with his brother Shiv Kumar was going on foot by the side of the road on national Highway 7. When he reached near village Baila, Brijendra Kumar, respondent no. 5, driving motor cycle No. MKA 4563 rashly and negligently came from the side of village Baila and dashed the same against him. Sudama Prasad sustained serious injuries and became unconscious. He was shifted to P. S. Chorhata where the report of the accident was lodged. Thereafter, he was shifted to G. M. H. Hospital, Rewa where his condition went on deteriorating and despite all the possible



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top